Title of dissertation: ARTISTIC AND ETHICAL VALUES IN THE EXPERIENCE OF NARRATIVES

Title of dissertation: ARTISTIC AND ETHICAL VALUES IN THE EXPERIENCE OF NARRATIVES Alessandro Giovannelli, Doctor of Philosophy, 2004 Dissertation directed by: Professor Jerrold Levinson. Department of Philosophy The ethical criticism of art has received increasing attention in contemporary aesthetics, especially with respect to the evaluation of narratives. The most prominent philosophical defenses of this art-critical practice concentrate on the notion of response, specifically on the emotional responses a narrative requires for it to be correctly apprehended and appreciated. I first investigate the mechanisms of emotional participation in narratives (Chapters 1-2); then, I address the question of the legitimacy of the ethical criticism of narratives and advance an argument in support of such a practice (Chapters 3-7). Chapter 1 analyzes different modes of emotional participation in narratives, distinguishing between: emotional inference, affective mimicry, empathy, sympathy, and concern. Chapter 2 first critically discusses Noël Carroll’s objections to identificationism and to an empathy-based account of character participation, and then analyzes the sorts of imaginative activities involved in narrative engagement, by investigating the distinctions introduced by Richard Wollheim between central and acentral imagining, and iconic and non-iconic imagination. Chapter 3 offers a taxonomy of the possible views on the relationship between the ethical and the artistic values of a narrative, distinguishing between reductionist and nonreductionist views, and sorting the latter ones into autonomism and moralism, radical and moderate. Chapter 4 analyzes the ethical assessment of narratives for (i) their consequences on their perceivers and (ii) the means of their production, and indicates the evaluation in terms of (iii) the ethical perspective a narrative embodies as the kind of ethical evaluation on which an argument for the ethical criticism of narratives ought to concentrate. Chapter 5 critically assesses the accounts of “imaginative resistance” to fiction offered by Kendall Walton, Richard Moran, and Tamar Gendler, and concludes that none of them is adequate to ground an argument for the ethical criticism of narratives. Chapter 6 looks at Carroll’s argument for moderate moralism and Berys Gaut’s “merited-response” argument for “ethicism,” and finds both arguments wanting. Chapter 7 proposes a version of moralism grounded in the notion of a narrative’s ethical perspective, and defended on the grounds of narratives’ commitments to provide a realistic (or “fitting”) representation of reality. ARTISTIC AND ETHICAL VALUES IN THE EXPERIENCE OF NARRATIVES